Burundi vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Burundi
74.69 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
32 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
10th
Costa Rica rank
13th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Burundi
  • Costa Rica
020406080197019962023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 74.69 million SLC per square kilometre against 32 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 42.69 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 2.3 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 10th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 180 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1970s 49.81 million SLC per square kilometre 8.87 million SLC per square kilometre 40.94 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 64.09 million SLC per square kilometre 11.05 million SLC per square kilometre 53.05 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 70.58 million SLC per square kilometre 17.33 million SLC per square kilometre 53.25 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 60.63 million SLC per square kilometre 23.78 million SLC per square kilometre 36.85 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 62.13 million SLC per square kilometre 29.03 million SLC per square kilometre 33.1 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 72.87 million SLC per square kilometre 31.4 million SLC per square kilometre 41.48 million SLC per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Burundi or Costa Rica?
Burundi, at 74.69 million SLC per square kilometre against 32 million SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Burundi and Costa Rica?
42.69 million SLC per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Costa Rica?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Costa Rica rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Burundi ranks 10th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/burundi/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/burundi/costa-rica/">Burundi vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.