Chile vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Chile
8.76 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
8.7 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
33rd
Mauritius rank
34th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
02468197019962023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 8.76 million SLC per square kilometre against 8.7 million SLC per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.06 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 33rd and Mauritius ranks 34th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre 3.62 million SLC per square kilometre 2.51 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 1.63 million SLC per square kilometre 4.12 million SLC per square kilometre 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 3.12 million SLC per square kilometre 4.48 million SLC per square kilometre 1.36 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 5.37 million SLC per square kilometre 5 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3686 million SLC per square kilometre Chile
2010s 8.01 million SLC per square kilometre 6.43 million SLC per square kilometre 1.59 million SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 8.7 million SLC per square kilometre 7.59 million SLC per square kilometre 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Chile or Mauritius?
Chile, at 8.76 million SLC per square kilometre against 8.7 million SLC per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Chile and Mauritius?
0.06 million SLC per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Chile ranks 33rd and Mauritius ranks 34th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.