Chile vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Chile
8.76 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
11.33 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
33rd
Pakistan rank
30th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Chile
  • Pakistan
02.557.51012.5197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 11.33 million SLC per square kilometre against 8.76 million SLC per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 2.57 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 30th of 180 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre 2.01 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9008 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 1.63 million SLC per square kilometre 2.84 million SLC per square kilometre 1.21 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 3.12 million SLC per square kilometre 4.46 million SLC per square kilometre 1.35 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 5.37 million SLC per square kilometre 7.08 million SLC per square kilometre 1.7 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 8.01 million SLC per square kilometre 9.02 million SLC per square kilometre 1.01 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 8.7 million SLC per square kilometre 10.83 million SLC per square kilometre 2.12 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Chile or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 11.33 million SLC per square kilometre against 8.76 million SLC per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Chile and Pakistan?
2.57 million SLC per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Chile and Pakistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Chile ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 30th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/chile/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/chile/pakistan/">Chile vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.