Congo vs Gambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Congo
1.62 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
1.76 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
55th
Gambia rank
52nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Congo
  • Gambia
0.511.52197019962023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1.76 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.62 million SLC per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.14 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Congo ranks 55th and Gambia ranks 52nd of 180 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.6265 million SLC per square kilometre 1.03 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4063 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.8639 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9267 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0628 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.7463 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9197 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1734 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 0.9001 million SLC per square kilometre 1.34 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4422 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 1.28 million SLC per square kilometre 1.37 million SLC per square kilometre 0.089 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 1.56 million SLC per square kilometre 1.62 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0585 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Congo or Gambia?
Gambia, at 1.76 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.62 million SLC per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Congo and Gambia?
0.14 million SLC per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Gambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and Gambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Congo ranks 55th and Gambia ranks 52nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Gambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/congo-rep/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/congo-rep/gambia-the/">Congo vs Gambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.