Costa Rica vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Costa Rica
32 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
26.09 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
13th
Nigeria rank
16th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Nigeria
0102030197019962023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 32 million SLC per square kilometre against 26.09 million SLC per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 5.91 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 13th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 180 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Nigeria Difference Ahead
1970s 8.87 million SLC per square kilometre 3.84 million SLC per square kilometre 5.04 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 11.05 million SLC per square kilometre 3.66 million SLC per square kilometre 7.39 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 17.33 million SLC per square kilometre 5.39 million SLC per square kilometre 11.93 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 23.78 million SLC per square kilometre 12.11 million SLC per square kilometre 11.67 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 29.03 million SLC per square kilometre 21.11 million SLC per square kilometre 7.92 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 31.4 million SLC per square kilometre 25.51 million SLC per square kilometre 5.89 million SLC per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Costa Rica or Nigeria?
Costa Rica, at 32 million SLC per square kilometre against 26.09 million SLC per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Costa Rica and Nigeria?
5.91 million SLC per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Nigeria?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Nigeria rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/costa-rica/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/costa-rica/nigeria/">Costa Rica vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.