How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Palau?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Cuba

0.0166 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Palau

0.0173 million SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Cuba rank

159th

Palau rank

158th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

Cuba
Palau

How they compare

Palau currently reports 0.0173 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0166 million SLC per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 159th and Palau ranks 158th of 180 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Palau	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0263 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0185 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0078 million SLC per square kilometre	Cuba
2000s	0.0283 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0212 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0071 million SLC per square kilometre	Cuba
2010s	0.0311 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0212 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0099 million SLC per square kilometre	Cuba
2020s	0.02 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0174 million SLC per square kilometre	0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Cuba or Palau?: Palau, at 0.0173 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0166 million SLC per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Cuba and Palau?: 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Palau?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Palau rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?: Cuba ranks 159th and Palau ranks 158th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/cuba/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/cuba/palau/">Cuba vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit: million SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.