Dominica vs Eswatini: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Dominica
0.2827 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.2696 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominica rank
87th
Eswatini rank
88th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Dominica
  • Eswatini
0.10.20.3197019962023

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 0.2827 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2696 million SLC per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0131 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Dominica ahead.

Dominica ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 88th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 5 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2534 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1025 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1509 million SLC per square kilometre Dominica
1980s 0.282 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1703 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1117 million SLC per square kilometre Dominica
1990s 0.2992 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1502 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1489 million SLC per square kilometre Dominica
2000s 0.2447 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2246 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0201 million SLC per square kilometre Dominica
2010s 0.252 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2625 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0105 million SLC per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.2658 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2592 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Dominica or Eswatini?
Dominica, at 0.2827 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2696 million SLC per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Dominica and Eswatini?
0.0131 million SLC per square kilometre, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Eswatini?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Dominica and Eswatini rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Dominica ranks 87th and Eswatini ranks 88th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs Eswatini: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/dominica/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/dominica/eswatini/">Dominica vs Eswatini: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.