Egypt vs Mexico: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Egypt
0.3716 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
0.3452 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
79th
Mexico rank
81st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Egypt
  • Mexico
0.10.20.30.4197019962023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.3716 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.3452 million SLC per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.0264 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mexico ahead.

Egypt ranks 79th and Mexico ranks 81st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Mexico Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0783 million SLC per square kilometre 0.145 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0667 million SLC per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.1049 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1879 million SLC per square kilometre 0.083 million SLC per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 0.143 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2107 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0677 million SLC per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 0.2016 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2525 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0508 million SLC per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 0.2771 million SLC per square kilometre 0.302 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0248 million SLC per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 0.3498 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3443 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0055 million SLC per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Egypt or Mexico?
Egypt, at 0.3716 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.3452 million SLC per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Egypt and Mexico?
0.0264 million SLC per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mexico?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Mexico rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Egypt ranks 79th and Mexico ranks 81st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Mexico: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/">Egypt vs Mexico: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.