Equatorial Guinea vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard
Equatorial Guinea
5.43 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
5.63 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
40th
Nepal rank
38th
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 5.63 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.43 million SLC per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.2 million SLC per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.76 million SLC per square kilometre | 1.4 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.3599 million SLC per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 2.27 million SLC per square kilometre | 1.71 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.5594 million SLC per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 2.91 million SLC per square kilometre | 2.33 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.5772 million SLC per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 3.37 million SLC per square kilometre | 3.23 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.1471 million SLC per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 4.65 million SLC per square kilometre | 4.42 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.2248 million SLC per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 5.07 million SLC per square kilometre | 5.42 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.3458 million SLC per square kilometre | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Equatorial Guinea or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 5.63 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.43 million SLC per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?
- 0.2 million SLC per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nepal?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Nepal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 40th and Nepal ranks 38th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.