Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Estonia
0.0069 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
168th
Zimbabwe rank
171st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Estonia
  • Zimbabwe
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0069 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0003 million SLC per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 180 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0065 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0045 million SLC per square kilometre 0.002 million SLC per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.0098 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0058 million SLC per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.0119 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0077 million SLC per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0.0085 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Estonia or Zimbabwe?
Estonia, at 0.0069 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Estonia and Zimbabwe?
0.0003 million SLC per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Estonia ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/estonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/estonia/zimbabwe/">Estonia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.