Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Ethiopia
0.6037 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.6407 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
69th
Uruguay rank
68th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Uruguay
0.20.30.40.50.6197019962023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.6407 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.6037 million SLC per square kilometre in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.037 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 180 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1675 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4039 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2365 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.2131 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4259 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2128 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.3982 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5765 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1783 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.5536 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6134 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0598 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Ethiopia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.6407 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.6037 million SLC per square kilometre in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Ethiopia and Uruguay?
0.037 million SLC per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uruguay?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Uruguay rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Ethiopia ranks 69th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/ethiopia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/ethiopia/uruguay/">Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.