Gambia vs Mongolia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Gambia
1.76 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
2.49 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
52nd
Mongolia rank
50th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Gambia
  • Mongolia
0.511.522.5197019962023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.76 million SLC per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.73 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 52nd and Mongolia ranks 50th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Mongolia Difference Ahead
1970s 1.03 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6727 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3601 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.9267 million SLC per square kilometre 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1785 million SLC per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.9197 million SLC per square kilometre 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1921 million SLC per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 1.34 million SLC per square kilometre 1.01 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3311 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 1.37 million SLC per square kilometre 1.81 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4389 million SLC per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 1.62 million SLC per square kilometre 2.56 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9396 million SLC per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Gambia or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.76 million SLC per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Gambia and Mongolia?
0.73 million SLC per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mongolia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Mongolia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Gambia ranks 52nd and Mongolia ranks 50th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Mongolia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/gambia-the/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/gambia-the/mongolia/">Gambia vs Mongolia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.