Gambia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Gambia
1.76 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
2.69 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
52nd
Thailand rank
49th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Gambia
  • Thailand
0.511.522.5197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 2.69 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.76 million SLC per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.93 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.5 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 49th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 1.03 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7441 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2888 million SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.9267 million SLC per square kilometre 1.09 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1621 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.9197 million SLC per square kilometre 1.56 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6372 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 1.34 million SLC per square kilometre 2.14 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8018 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 1.37 million SLC per square kilometre 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre 1.12 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 1.62 million SLC per square kilometre 2.6 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9842 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Gambia or Thailand?
Thailand, at 2.69 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.76 million SLC per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Gambia and Thailand?
0.93 million SLC per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Thailand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Thailand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Gambia ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 49th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/gambia-the/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/gambia-the/thailand/">Gambia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.