Georgia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Georgia
0.0453 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.048 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
137th
New Zealand rank
134th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Georgia
  • New Zealand
0.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.048 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0453 million SLC per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 137th and New Zealand ranks 134th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0553 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0324 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0229 million SLC per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.0398 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0377 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.0401 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0414 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0013 million SLC per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0465 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0452 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0012 million SLC per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Georgia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.048 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0453 million SLC per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Georgia and New Zealand?
0.0027 million SLC per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and New Zealand?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Georgia ranks 137th and New Zealand ranks 134th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/georgia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/georgia/new-zealand/">Georgia vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.