Ghana vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Ghana
0.2444 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.2195 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
92nd
Singapore rank
93rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Ghana
  • Singapore
00.20.40.6197019962023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.2444 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2195 million SLC per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0249 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Singapore ahead.

Ghana ranks 92nd and Singapore ranks 93rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.058 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5304 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4725 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.0606 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5482 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4876 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0744 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3004 million SLC per square kilometre 0.226 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.111 million SLC per square kilometre 0.179 million SLC per square kilometre 0.068 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.163 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1925 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0295 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.2275 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2183 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0092 million SLC per square kilometre Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Ghana or Singapore?
Ghana, at 0.2444 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2195 million SLC per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Ghana and Singapore?
0.0249 million SLC per square kilometre, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Singapore?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Singapore rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Ghana ranks 92nd and Singapore ranks 93rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/ghana/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/ghana/singapore/">Ghana vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.