Greenland vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Greenland
0.0112 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
164th
Zambia rank
165th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Greenland
  • Zambia
0.0030.0050.0070.010.0130.015197019962023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.0112 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Greenland ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0044 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0086 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0095 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre 0.013 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0074 million SLC per square kilometre 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0081 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0128 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0047 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0102 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0133 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Greenland or Zambia?
Greenland, at 0.0112 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Greenland and Zambia?
0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Greenland ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/greenland/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/greenland/zambia/">Greenland vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.