Hungary vs Japan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Hungary
14.78 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
15.93 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
24th
Japan rank
22nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Hungary
  • Japan
0102030197019962023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 15.93 million SLC per square kilometre against 14.78 million SLC per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 1.15 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Japan ahead.

Hungary ranks 24th and Japan ranks 22nd of 180 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Japan Difference Ahead
1970s 12.08 million SLC per square kilometre 23.85 million SLC per square kilometre 11.77 million SLC per square kilometre Japan
1980s 16.17 million SLC per square kilometre 23.77 million SLC per square kilometre 7.6 million SLC per square kilometre Japan
1990s 12.96 million SLC per square kilometre 21.17 million SLC per square kilometre 8.21 million SLC per square kilometre Japan
2000s 13.93 million SLC per square kilometre 19.08 million SLC per square kilometre 5.15 million SLC per square kilometre Japan
2010s 14.26 million SLC per square kilometre 15.49 million SLC per square kilometre 1.23 million SLC per square kilometre Japan
2020s 13.69 million SLC per square kilometre 14.73 million SLC per square kilometre 1.04 million SLC per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Hungary or Japan?
Japan, at 15.93 million SLC per square kilometre against 14.78 million SLC per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Hungary and Japan?
1.15 million SLC per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Japan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Japan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Hungary ranks 24th and Japan ranks 22nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Japan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/hungary/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/hungary/japan/">Hungary vs Japan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.