Hungary vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Hungary
14.78 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
14.06 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
24th
Malawi rank
26th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Hungary
  • Malawi
05101520197019962023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 14.78 million SLC per square kilometre against 14.06 million SLC per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.72 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 26th of 180 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 12.08 million SLC per square kilometre 3.14 million SLC per square kilometre 8.94 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 16.17 million SLC per square kilometre 3.81 million SLC per square kilometre 12.35 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 12.96 million SLC per square kilometre 4.92 million SLC per square kilometre 8.04 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 13.93 million SLC per square kilometre 6.91 million SLC per square kilometre 7.02 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 14.26 million SLC per square kilometre 10.5 million SLC per square kilometre 3.75 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 13.69 million SLC per square kilometre 13.58 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1002 million SLC per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Hungary or Malawi?
Hungary, at 14.78 million SLC per square kilometre against 14.06 million SLC per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Hungary and Malawi?
0.72 million SLC per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Malawi?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Malawi rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Hungary ranks 24th and Malawi ranks 26th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/hungary/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/hungary/malawi/">Hungary vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.