Indonesia vs Uzbekistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Indonesia
1,020 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
187.3 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
1st
Uzbekistan rank
3rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Indonesia
  • Uzbekistan
02004006008001.0k197019962023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 1,020 million SLC per square kilometre against 187.3 million SLC per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 832.7 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 5.4 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 180 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 465.9 million SLC per square kilometre 54.86 million SLC per square kilometre 411.03 million SLC per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 560.82 million SLC per square kilometre 79.59 million SLC per square kilometre 481.22 million SLC per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 813.45 million SLC per square kilometre 140.15 million SLC per square kilometre 673.3 million SLC per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 996.82 million SLC per square kilometre 177.03 million SLC per square kilometre 819.79 million SLC per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Indonesia or Uzbekistan?
Indonesia, at 1,020 million SLC per square kilometre against 187.3 million SLC per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Indonesia and Uzbekistan?
832.7 million SLC per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Uzbekistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Indonesia ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Uzbekistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/indonesia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/indonesia/uzbekistan/">Indonesia vs Uzbekistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.