Israel vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Israel
0.8225 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.8658 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
65th
Kazakhstan rank
63rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Israel
  • Kazakhstan
00.20.40.60.81197019962023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.8658 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.8225 million SLC per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.0433 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Israel ranks 65th and Kazakhstan ranks 63rd of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5228 million SLC per square kilometre 0.554 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0311 million SLC per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.7633 million SLC per square kilometre 0.555 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2083 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.8433 million SLC per square kilometre 0.726 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1173 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2020s 0.8345 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8871 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0525 million SLC per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Israel or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0.8658 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.8225 million SLC per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Israel and Kazakhstan?
0.0433 million SLC per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Israel and Kazakhstan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Israel ranks 65th and Kazakhstan ranks 63rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/israel/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/israel/kazakhstan/">Israel vs Kazakhstan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.