Israel vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Israel
0.8225 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
65th
Malta rank
67th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Israel
  • Malta
0.20.40.60.81197019962023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0.8225 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.135 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Israel ranks 65th and Malta ranks 67th of 180 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4951 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1527 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3424 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
1980s 0.4845 million SLC per square kilometre 0.205 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2795 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.4987 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2342 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2645 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.7633 million SLC per square kilometre 0.349 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4143 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.8433 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2781 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5652 million SLC per square kilometre Israel
2020s 0.8345 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4352 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3994 million SLC per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Israel or Malta?
Israel, at 0.8225 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Israel and Malta?
0.135 million SLC per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Malta?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Israel and Malta rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Israel ranks 65th and Malta ranks 67th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/israel/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/israel/malta/">Israel vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.