Italy vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Italy
0.1023 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0.0958 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy rank
111th
Kiribati rank
113th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Italy
  • Kiribati
0.040.060.080.10.12197019962023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0.1023 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0958 million SLC per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0065 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 111th and Kiribati ranks 113th of 180 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Kiribati Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0721 million SLC per square kilometre 0.065 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0071 million SLC per square kilometre Italy
1980s 0.0849 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0568 million SLC per square kilometre 0.028 million SLC per square kilometre Italy
1990s 0.1032 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0733 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0299 million SLC per square kilometre Italy
2000s 0.1108 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0638 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0469 million SLC per square kilometre Italy
2010s 0.1097 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0796 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0302 million SLC per square kilometre Italy
2020s 0.1038 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0965 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0073 million SLC per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Italy or Kiribati?
Italy, at 0.1023 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0958 million SLC per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Italy and Kiribati?
0.0065 million SLC per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Kiribati?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Italy and Kiribati rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Italy ranks 111th and Kiribati ranks 113th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/italy/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/italy/kiribati/">Italy vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.