Jamaica vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Jamaica
12.07 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
14.06 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
29th
Malawi rank
26th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Jamaica
  • Malawi
2.557.51012.515197019962023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 14.06 million SLC per square kilometre against 12.07 million SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 1.99 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 26th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 6.44 million SLC per square kilometre 3.14 million SLC per square kilometre 3.3 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 6.47 million SLC per square kilometre 3.81 million SLC per square kilometre 2.66 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 9.43 million SLC per square kilometre 4.92 million SLC per square kilometre 4.51 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 8.37 million SLC per square kilometre 6.91 million SLC per square kilometre 1.46 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 10.05 million SLC per square kilometre 10.5 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4527 million SLC per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 11.87 million SLC per square kilometre 13.58 million SLC per square kilometre 1.72 million SLC per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Jamaica or Malawi?
Malawi, at 14.06 million SLC per square kilometre against 12.07 million SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Jamaica and Malawi?
1.99 million SLC per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malawi?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Malawi rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Jamaica ranks 29th and Malawi ranks 26th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/jamaica/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/jamaica/malawi/">Jamaica vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.