Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Jamaica
12.07 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
11.33 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
29th
Pakistan rank
30th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Jamaica
  • Pakistan
2.557.51012.5197019962023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 12.07 million SLC per square kilometre against 11.33 million SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.74 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 180 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 6.44 million SLC per square kilometre 2.01 million SLC per square kilometre 4.43 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 6.47 million SLC per square kilometre 2.84 million SLC per square kilometre 3.64 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 9.43 million SLC per square kilometre 4.46 million SLC per square kilometre 4.96 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 8.37 million SLC per square kilometre 7.08 million SLC per square kilometre 1.29 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 10.05 million SLC per square kilometre 9.02 million SLC per square kilometre 1.03 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 11.87 million SLC per square kilometre 10.83 million SLC per square kilometre 1.04 million SLC per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Jamaica or Pakistan?
Jamaica, at 12.07 million SLC per square kilometre against 11.33 million SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Jamaica and Pakistan?
0.74 million SLC per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Pakistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Jamaica ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 30th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/jamaica/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/jamaica/pakistan/">Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.