Kazakhstan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Kazakhstan
0.8658 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.8572 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
63rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
64th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.20.40.60.81197019962023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.8658 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.8572 million SLC per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0086 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 64th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.554 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4939 million SLC per square kilometre 0.06 million SLC per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.555 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6482 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0932 million SLC per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.726 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8489 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1229 million SLC per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.8871 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8657 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Kazakhstan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Kazakhstan, at 0.8658 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.8572 million SLC per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Kazakhstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0086 million SLC per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sao Tome and Principe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Kazakhstan ranks 63rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 64th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/kazakhstan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/kazakhstan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Kazakhstan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.