Kenya vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Kenya
2.74 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
2.21 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
48th
New Caledonia rank
51st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Kenya
  • New Caledonia
0123197019962023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 2.74 million SLC per square kilometre against 2.21 million SLC per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.53 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Kenya ranks 48th and New Caledonia ranks 51st of 180 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.705 million SLC per square kilometre 0.575 million SLC per square kilometre 0.13 million SLC per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 1.04 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3266 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7085 million SLC per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 1.28 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5536 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7271 million SLC per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 1.68 million SLC per square kilometre 0.63 million SLC per square kilometre 1.05 million SLC per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 2.28 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9897 million SLC per square kilometre 1.29 million SLC per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 2.64 million SLC per square kilometre 1.92 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7217 million SLC per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Kenya or New Caledonia?
Kenya, at 2.74 million SLC per square kilometre against 2.21 million SLC per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Kenya and New Caledonia?
0.53 million SLC per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and New Caledonia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Kenya and New Caledonia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Kenya ranks 48th and New Caledonia ranks 51st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/kenya/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/kenya/new-caledonia/">Kenya vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.