Latvia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0122 million SLC per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.001 million SLC per square kilometre.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.009 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0104 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.0107 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0141 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.0129 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0131 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0134 million SLC per square kilometre | 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Latvia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0122 million SLC per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Latvia and Namibia?
- 0.001 million SLC per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
- Latvia ranks 163rd and Namibia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.