Latvia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Latvia
0.0122 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
163rd
Zambia rank
165th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Latvia
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.015197019962023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0122 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.009 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0107 million SLC per square kilometre 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0033 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0129 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0128 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0133 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Latvia or Zambia?
Latvia, at 0.0122 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Latvia and Zambia?
0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Latvia ranks 163rd and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/latvia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/latvia/zambia/">Latvia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.