Lebanon vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Lebanon
360.87 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
148.94 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Lebanon rank
2nd
Uganda rank
5th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Lebanon
  • Uganda
0100200300400197019962023

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 360.87 million SLC per square kilometre against 148.94 million SLC per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 211.93 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 2.4 times Uganda's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.

Lebanon ranks 2nd and Uganda ranks 5th of 180 countries.

Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 109.46 million SLC per square kilometre 42.49 million SLC per square kilometre 66.96 million SLC per square kilometre Lebanon
1980s 95.05 million SLC per square kilometre 40.64 million SLC per square kilometre 54.41 million SLC per square kilometre Lebanon
1990s 161.42 million SLC per square kilometre 58.56 million SLC per square kilometre 102.86 million SLC per square kilometre Lebanon
2000s 219.05 million SLC per square kilometre 87.22 million SLC per square kilometre 131.83 million SLC per square kilometre Lebanon
2010s 260.62 million SLC per square kilometre 108.71 million SLC per square kilometre 151.91 million SLC per square kilometre Lebanon
2020s 345.05 million SLC per square kilometre 140.9 million SLC per square kilometre 204.15 million SLC per square kilometre Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Lebanon or Uganda?
Lebanon, at 360.87 million SLC per square kilometre against 148.94 million SLC per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Lebanon and Uganda?
211.93 million SLC per square kilometre, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Lebanon and Uganda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Lebanon ranks 2nd and Uganda ranks 5th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/lebanon/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/lebanon/uganda/">Lebanon vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.