Liberia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Liberia
0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia rank
170th
Zimbabwe rank
171st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Liberia
  • Zimbabwe
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0029 million SLC per square kilometre 0.003 million SLC per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 0.0065 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 0.0036 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0045 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0009 million SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.009 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0041 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0049 million SLC per square kilometre Liberia
2010s 0.0076 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0042 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0034 million SLC per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 0.0064 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0059 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0005 million SLC per square kilometre Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Liberia or Zimbabwe?
Liberia, at 0.0067 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0066 million SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Liberia and Zimbabwe?
0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Liberia ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 171st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/liberia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/liberia/zimbabwe/">Liberia vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.