Madagascar vs Togo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Madagascar
16.56 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
17.83 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar rank
21st
Togo rank
20th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Madagascar
  • Togo
5101520197019962023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 17.83 million SLC per square kilometre against 16.56 million SLC per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 1.27 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 21st and Togo ranks 20th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 5 and Togo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Togo Difference Ahead
1970s 8.1 million SLC per square kilometre 4.02 million SLC per square kilometre 4.09 million SLC per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 8.91 million SLC per square kilometre 5.82 million SLC per square kilometre 3.08 million SLC per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 11.07 million SLC per square kilometre 8.85 million SLC per square kilometre 2.22 million SLC per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 13.49 million SLC per square kilometre 10.19 million SLC per square kilometre 3.29 million SLC per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 15.1 million SLC per square kilometre 12.42 million SLC per square kilometre 2.68 million SLC per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 15.88 million SLC per square kilometre 16.75 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8687 million SLC per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Madagascar or Togo?
Togo, at 17.83 million SLC per square kilometre against 16.56 million SLC per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Madagascar and Togo?
1.27 million SLC per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Togo?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Madagascar and Togo rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Madagascar ranks 21st and Togo ranks 20th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Togo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/madagascar/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/madagascar/togo/">Madagascar vs Togo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.