Maldives vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Maldives
14.46 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
15.1 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
25th
Sri Lanka rank
23rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Maldives
  • Sri Lanka
2.557.51012.515197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 15.1 million SLC per square kilometre against 14.46 million SLC per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0.64 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Maldives ranks 25th and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 3.89 million SLC per square kilometre 4.43 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5438 million SLC per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 6.05 million SLC per square kilometre 6 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0487 million SLC per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 9.21 million SLC per square kilometre 7.13 million SLC per square kilometre 2.08 million SLC per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 12.84 million SLC per square kilometre 8.76 million SLC per square kilometre 4.08 million SLC per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 11.9 million SLC per square kilometre 14.08 million SLC per square kilometre 2.18 million SLC per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 13.68 million SLC per square kilometre 15.1 million SLC per square kilometre 1.42 million SLC per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Maldives or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 15.1 million SLC per square kilometre against 14.46 million SLC per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Maldives and Sri Lanka?
0.64 million SLC per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Sri Lanka rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Maldives ranks 25th and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/maldives/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/maldives/sri-lanka/">Maldives vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.