Malta vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Malta
0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.5914 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
67th
Nicaragua rank
70th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Malta
  • Nicaragua
0.20.40.6197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.5914 million SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0961 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Malta ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 70th of 180 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1527 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2683 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1155 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.205 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2274 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0224 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 0.2342 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2393 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0051 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.349 million SLC per square kilometre 0.371 million SLC per square kilometre 0.022 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 0.2781 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4895 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2114 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 0.4352 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5876 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1524 million SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Malta or Nicaragua?
Malta, at 0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.5914 million SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Malta and Nicaragua?
0.0961 million SLC per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nicaragua?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and Nicaragua rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Malta ranks 67th and Nicaragua ranks 70th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/malta/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/malta/nicaragua/">Malta vs Nicaragua: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.