Malta vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Malta
0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.6407 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
67th
Uruguay rank
68th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Malta
  • Uruguay
0.20.40.6197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.6407 million SLC per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0468 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uruguay ahead.

Malta ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 180 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Uruguay Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1527 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2742 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1215 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.205 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3108 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1058 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.2342 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3848 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1505 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.349 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4259 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0769 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.2781 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5765 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2984 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.4352 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6134 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1782 million SLC per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Malta or Uruguay?
Malta, at 0.6875 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.6407 million SLC per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Malta and Uruguay?
0.0468 million SLC per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uruguay?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and Uruguay rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Malta ranks 67th and Uruguay ranks 68th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/malta/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/malta/uruguay/">Malta vs Uruguay: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.