Mauritania vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Mauritania
0.052 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0513 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
131st
Tunisia rank
132nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Mauritania
  • Tunisia
0.010.020.030.040.050.06197019962023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.052 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0513 million SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 131st and Tunisia ranks 132nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0337 million SLC per square kilometre 0.017 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0168 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0.0317 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0212 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0105 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0.0358 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0303 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0055 million SLC per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0.0311 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0399 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0088 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0413 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0509 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0096 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0507 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0561 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0055 million SLC per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Mauritania or Tunisia?
Mauritania, at 0.052 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0513 million SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Mauritania and Tunisia?
0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Tunisia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Mauritania ranks 131st and Tunisia ranks 132nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mauritania/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mauritania/tunisia/">Mauritania vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.