Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Mongolia
2.49 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
1.74 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
50th
North Macedonia rank
53rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Mongolia
  • North Macedonia
0.511.522.5197019962023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.74 million SLC per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.75 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 50th and North Macedonia ranks 53rd of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre 1.84 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7284 million SLC per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 1.01 million SLC per square kilometre 2.01 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9946 million SLC per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 1.81 million SLC per square kilometre 2.08 million SLC per square kilometre 0.271 million SLC per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 2.56 million SLC per square kilometre 1.89 million SLC per square kilometre 0.672 million SLC per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
Mongolia, at 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre against 1.74 million SLC per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
0.75 million SLC per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Mongolia ranks 50th and North Macedonia ranks 53rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mongolia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mongolia/north-macedonia/">Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.