Mongolia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Mongolia
2.49 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
2.69 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
50th
Thailand rank
49th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Mongolia
  • Thailand
0.511.522.5197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 2.69 million SLC per square kilometre against 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.2 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Thailand ahead.

Mongolia ranks 50th and Thailand ranks 49th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.6727 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7441 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0713 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre 1.09 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0163 million SLC per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 1.11 million SLC per square kilometre 1.56 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4451 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 1.01 million SLC per square kilometre 2.14 million SLC per square kilometre 1.13 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 1.81 million SLC per square kilometre 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6828 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 2.56 million SLC per square kilometre 2.6 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0447 million SLC per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Mongolia or Thailand?
Thailand, at 2.69 million SLC per square kilometre against 2.49 million SLC per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Mongolia and Thailand?
0.2 million SLC per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Thailand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Thailand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Mongolia ranks 50th and Thailand ranks 49th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mongolia/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mongolia/thailand/">Mongolia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.