Mozambique vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Mozambique
0.2608 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
0.2528 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
89th
Tonga rank
91st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Mozambique
  • Tonga
0.050.10.150.20.25197019962023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.2608 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2528 million SLC per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 0.008 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tonga ahead.

Mozambique ranks 89th and Tonga ranks 91st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Tonga Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0504 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0759 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0255 million SLC per square kilometre Tonga
1980s 0.0559 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1509 million SLC per square kilometre 0.095 million SLC per square kilometre Tonga
1990s 0.0706 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1865 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1159 million SLC per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 0.1194 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1841 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0646 million SLC per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 0.1937 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1936 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0002 million SLC per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 0.2451 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2236 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0215 million SLC per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Mozambique or Tonga?
Mozambique, at 0.2608 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2528 million SLC per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Mozambique and Tonga?
0.008 million SLC per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tonga?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Tonga rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Mozambique ranks 89th and Tonga ranks 91st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mozambique/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/mozambique/tonga/">Mozambique vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.