Myanmar vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Myanmar
31.91 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
26.09 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
14th
Nigeria rank
16th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Myanmar
  • Nigeria
0102030197019962023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 31.91 million SLC per square kilometre against 26.09 million SLC per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 5.82 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 14th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 180 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Nigeria Difference Ahead
1970s 4.48 million SLC per square kilometre 3.84 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6393 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 7.08 million SLC per square kilometre 3.66 million SLC per square kilometre 3.43 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 8.47 million SLC per square kilometre 5.39 million SLC per square kilometre 3.07 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
2000s 18.55 million SLC per square kilometre 12.11 million SLC per square kilometre 6.44 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 27.62 million SLC per square kilometre 21.11 million SLC per square kilometre 6.51 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 30.54 million SLC per square kilometre 25.51 million SLC per square kilometre 5.04 million SLC per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Myanmar or Nigeria?
Myanmar, at 31.91 million SLC per square kilometre against 26.09 million SLC per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Myanmar and Nigeria?
5.82 million SLC per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Nigeria?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Nigeria rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Myanmar ranks 14th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/myanmar/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/myanmar/nigeria/">Myanmar vs Nigeria: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.