Namibia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Namibia
0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
162nd
Zambia rank
165th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Namibia
  • Zambia
0.0050.0070.010.0130.0150.018197019962023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Namibia ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0068 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0086 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0017 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0087 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0095 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0007 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0105 million SLC per square kilometre 0.013 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0025 million SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.0141 million SLC per square kilometre 0.014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0131 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0128 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0004 million SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0134 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0133 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0001 million SLC per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Namibia or Zambia?
Namibia, at 0.0132 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0111 million SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Namibia and Zambia?
0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Namibia ranks 162nd and Zambia ranks 165th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/namibia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/namibia/zambia/">Namibia vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.