Naoero vs Qatar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Naoero
0.187 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0.1748 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero rank
96th
Qatar rank
98th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Naoero
  • Qatar
00.250.50.7511.2197019962023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0.187 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1748 million SLC per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 0.0122 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.

Naoero ranks 96th and Qatar ranks 98th of 180 countries.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Qatar Difference Ahead
1970s 0.973 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0323 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9407 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
1980s 0.7787 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0315 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7472 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
1990s 0.3908 million SLC per square kilometre 0.036 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3548 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
2000s 0.1813 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0332 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1481 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 0.1404 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0856 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0548 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 0.1806 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1621 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0185 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Naoero or Qatar?
Naoero, at 0.187 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1748 million SLC per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Naoero and Qatar?
0.0122 million SLC per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Qatar?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Naoero and Qatar rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Naoero ranks 96th and Qatar ranks 98th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Qatar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/naoero/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/naoero/qatar/">Naoero vs Qatar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.