Naoero vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Naoero
0.187 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.1762 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero rank
96th
Tuvalu rank
97th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Naoero
  • Tuvalu
00.250.50.7511.2197019962023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0.187 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1762 million SLC per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0108 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Naoero ahead.

Naoero ranks 96th and Tuvalu ranks 97th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 0.973 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1131 million SLC per square kilometre 0.8599 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
1980s 0.7787 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1317 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6471 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
1990s 0.3908 million SLC per square kilometre 0.276 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1147 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero
2000s 0.1813 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2821 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1008 million SLC per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 0.1404 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2547 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1143 million SLC per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 0.1806 million SLC per square kilometre 0.178 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0026 million SLC per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Naoero or Tuvalu?
Naoero, at 0.187 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1762 million SLC per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Naoero and Tuvalu?
0.0108 million SLC per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Tuvalu?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Naoero and Tuvalu rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Naoero ranks 96th and Tuvalu ranks 97th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/naoero/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/naoero/tuvalu/">Naoero vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.