Nepal vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Nepal
5.63 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
5.5 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
38th
Philippines rank
39th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Nepal
  • Philippines
123456197019962023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 5.63 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.5 million SLC per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.13 million SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Philippines ahead.

Nepal ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 39th of 180 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Philippines Difference Ahead
1970s 1.4 million SLC per square kilometre 1.98 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5827 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
1980s 1.71 million SLC per square kilometre 2.5 million SLC per square kilometre 0.7919 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
1990s 2.33 million SLC per square kilometre 2.87 million SLC per square kilometre 0.5421 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 3.23 million SLC per square kilometre 3.91 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6814 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 4.42 million SLC per square kilometre 5.06 million SLC per square kilometre 0.6397 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 5.42 million SLC per square kilometre 5.44 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0207 million SLC per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Nepal or Philippines?
Nepal, at 5.63 million SLC per square kilometre against 5.5 million SLC per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Nepal and Philippines?
0.13 million SLC per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Philippines?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Philippines rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Nepal ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 39th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/nepal/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/nepal/philippines/">Nepal vs Philippines: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.