New Zealand vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

New Zealand
0.048 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0469 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
134th
Turkmenistan rank
135th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • New Zealand
  • Turkmenistan
0.010.020.030.040.05197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.048 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0469 million SLC per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 134th and Turkmenistan ranks 135th of 180 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0324 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0165 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0159 million SLC per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.0377 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0214 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0164 million SLC per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0414 million SLC per square kilometre 0.026 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0154 million SLC per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0452 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0429 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0023 million SLC per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, New Zealand or Turkmenistan?
New Zealand, at 0.048 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0469 million SLC per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between New Zealand and Turkmenistan?
0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Turkmenistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
New Zealand ranks 134th and Turkmenistan ranks 135th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/new-zealand/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/new-zealand/turkmenistan/">New Zealand vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.