Norway vs Romania: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Norway
0.1394 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.1611 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
104th
Romania rank
101st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Norway
  • Romania
0.050.10.150.2197019962023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.1611 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1394 million SLC per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0217 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Romania ahead.

Norway ranks 104th and Romania ranks 101st of 180 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Romania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0548 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1162 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0614 million SLC per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0593 million SLC per square kilometre 0.135 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0757 million SLC per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0766 million SLC per square kilometre 0.157 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0803 million SLC per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0927 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1466 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0539 million SLC per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.1256 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1442 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0186 million SLC per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.141 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1567 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0157 million SLC per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Norway or Romania?
Romania, at 0.1611 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1394 million SLC per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Norway and Romania?
0.0217 million SLC per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Romania?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Romania rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Norway ranks 104th and Romania ranks 101st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Romania: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/norway/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/norway/romania/">Norway vs Romania: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.