Norway vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Norway
0.1394 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.1106 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
104th
Sweden rank
107th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Norway
  • Sweden
0.060.080.10.120.14197019962023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.1394 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1106 million SLC per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0288 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.3 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Norway ranks 104th and Sweden ranks 107th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0548 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0934 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0386 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.0593 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0956 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0363 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0766 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0973 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0207 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0927 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1056 million SLC per square kilometre 0.013 million SLC per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.1256 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1251 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0006 million SLC per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.141 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1226 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0184 million SLC per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Norway or Sweden?
Norway, at 0.1394 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.1106 million SLC per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Norway and Sweden?
0.0288 million SLC per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Norway and Sweden rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Norway ranks 104th and Sweden ranks 107th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/norway/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/norway/sweden/">Norway vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.