Pakistan vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Pakistan
11.33 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
12.64 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
30th
Senegal rank
28th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Pakistan
  • Senegal
2.557.51012.5197019962023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 12.64 million SLC per square kilometre against 11.33 million SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 1.31 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Senegal ahead.

Pakistan ranks 30th and Senegal ranks 28th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Senegal Difference Ahead
1970s 2.01 million SLC per square kilometre 3.66 million SLC per square kilometre 1.65 million SLC per square kilometre Senegal
1980s 2.84 million SLC per square kilometre 3.8 million SLC per square kilometre 0.9637 million SLC per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 4.46 million SLC per square kilometre 4.52 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0521 million SLC per square kilometre Senegal
2000s 7.08 million SLC per square kilometre 5.59 million SLC per square kilometre 1.48 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 9.02 million SLC per square kilometre 7.97 million SLC per square kilometre 1.05 million SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 10.83 million SLC per square kilometre 11.91 million SLC per square kilometre 1.08 million SLC per square kilometre Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Pakistan or Senegal?
Senegal, at 12.64 million SLC per square kilometre against 11.33 million SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Pakistan and Senegal?
1.31 million SLC per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Senegal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Senegal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Pakistan ranks 30th and Senegal ranks 28th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/pakistan/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/pakistan/senegal/">Pakistan vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.