Singapore vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Singapore
0.2195 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
0.2528 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore rank
93rd
Tonga rank
91st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Singapore
  • Tonga
00.20.40.6197019962023

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 0.2528 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2195 million SLC per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0333 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.2 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Singapore ahead.

Singapore ranks 93rd and Tonga ranks 91st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Tonga Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5304 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0759 million SLC per square kilometre 0.4546 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.5482 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1509 million SLC per square kilometre 0.3973 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.3004 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1865 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1139 million SLC per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.179 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1841 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0051 million SLC per square kilometre Tonga
2010s 0.1925 million SLC per square kilometre 0.1936 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre Tonga
2020s 0.2183 million SLC per square kilometre 0.2236 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0053 million SLC per square kilometre Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Singapore or Tonga?
Tonga, at 0.2528 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.2195 million SLC per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Singapore and Tonga?
0.0333 million SLC per square kilometre, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tonga?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Singapore and Tonga rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Singapore ranks 93rd and Tonga ranks 91st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/singapore/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/singapore/tonga/">Singapore vs Tonga: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.