Somalia vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

Somalia
181.16 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
148.94 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia rank
4th
Uganda rank
5th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • Somalia
  • Uganda
050100150200197019962023

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 181.16 million SLC per square kilometre against 148.94 million SLC per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 32.22 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Somalia's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Somalia ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 5th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Somalia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Somalia Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 25.76 million SLC per square kilometre 42.49 million SLC per square kilometre 16.74 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 35.61 million SLC per square kilometre 40.64 million SLC per square kilometre 5.03 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 35.06 million SLC per square kilometre 58.56 million SLC per square kilometre 23.51 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 56.82 million SLC per square kilometre 87.22 million SLC per square kilometre 30.4 million SLC per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 120.22 million SLC per square kilometre 108.71 million SLC per square kilometre 11.52 million SLC per square kilometre Somalia
2020s 171.94 million SLC per square kilometre 140.9 million SLC per square kilometre 31.04 million SLC per square kilometre Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, Somalia or Uganda?
Somalia, at 181.16 million SLC per square kilometre against 148.94 million SLC per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between Somalia and Uganda?
32.22 million SLC per square kilometre, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Somalia and Uganda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
Somalia ranks 4th and Uganda ranks 5th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Somalia vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/somalia-fed-rep/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/somalia-fed-rep/uganda/">Somalia vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.