South Sudan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard

South Sudan
0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan rank
179th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
176th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard over time

  • South Sudan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197019962023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0.002 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 3.0 times South Sudan's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

South Sudan ranks 179th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 176th of 180 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0014 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0044 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0013 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0035 million SLC per square kilometre 0.0021 million SLC per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard, South Sudan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0031 million SLC per square kilometre against 0.0011 million SLC per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard between South Sudan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.002 million SLC per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do South Sudan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value standard?
South Sudan ranks 179th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 176th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/south-sudan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices-4/south-sudan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">South Sudan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,977 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.